Can cost asymmetry be a rationale for privatisation?

- Cost asymmetries were considered to be a rationale for privatisation.
- This policy does not consider other ways of reducing production inefficiency.
- Cost asymmetry may not be the reason for privatisation under technology licensing.

Cost asymmetries between the public and the private firms create a rationale for privatising the public firms. We show that this argument is restrictive, since it does not allow for other ways of reducing production inefficiency, which creates the motivation for privatisation. If the profit maximising private firm is technologically superior to that of the welfare maximising public firm, the society and the private firm benefit from technology licensing. Under technology licensing, both the equilibrium output of the private firm and the equilibrium degree of privatisation are zero. However, if cost asymmetry cannot be bridged by technology licensing due to costly and/or imperfect technology transfer, the argument in favour of privatisation remains.