Fighting corruption or elections? The politics of anti-corruption policies in India: A subnational study

- The paper investigates whether the timing of elections affects the incumbent government's efforts to control corruption.
- Panel data on 30 Indian states during the 1988-2009 period is used to examine the question.
- The findings show that scheduled elections (and not unscheduled elections) are associated with an increase in the number of corruption cases registered by the respective state's anti-corruption agencies.
- On the other hand, there is no effect of scheduled elections on corruption cases being investigated by anti-corruption agencies.

This paper extends political budget cycles theory to corruption, where an incumbent government considers controlling corruption based purely on political considerations. Using panel data on 30 Indian states during the 1988-2009 period, I investigate whether the timing of elections affects the incumbent government's efforts to control corruption. Consistent with the idea that an incumbent politician might exert greater effort to control corruption during election years, I find that scheduled elections (as opposed to unscheduled elections) are associated with an increase in the number of corruption cases registered by the respective state's anti-corruption agencies, although the substantive impact is small. Furthermore, I find this effect in 'swing states' where margin of victory for the incumbent in previous elections has been narrow. On the other hand, there is no effect of scheduled elections on corruption cases being investigated by anti-corruption agencies. Thus, the argument that Indian politicians engage in 'cheap talk' on controlling corruption, especially during election periods is suggestive at best.