Opportunity for interprofessional collaborative care-findings from a sample of federally qualified health center patients in the Midwest

- Most prevalent chronic conditions in this federally qualified health center are diabetes, depression, anxiety, and chronic pain.
- 46.6% of participants were seen by 2-3 providers; 20% had 7+ office visits in the last year.
- An interprofessional collaborate healthcare model should be explored for this population.

ObjectivesFederally qualified health centers (FQHCs) frequently serve more socio-economically disadvantaged populations; existing literature suggests that underserved groups are more likely to experience various chronic physical and mental health conditions. FQHC patients may have significant needs for various specialty services that are beyond common FQHC providers. This study examines chronic condition prevalence, healthcare satisfaction, and use of multiprovider services in a Midwest FQHC patient population. We also evaluated the potential of interprofessional collaborative practices in FQHC settings.Study designCross-sectional study.MethodsA total of 232 participants were recruited prior to or immediately after their scheduled clinic visit within an FQHC located on the fringes of an urban area. Respondents were invited to complete a brief questionnaire and grant access to their electronic medical records.ResultsNearly half of participants were covered by Medicaid, private insurance carriers (19.4%), or Medicare (17.7%). The most prevalent chronic conditions included diabetes, depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Almost half (46.6%) of participants were seen by two or three providers; 20% had 7+ office visits in the last year. While 35.3% reported health dissatisfaction, 30.6% reported health satisfaction. When asked if they were satisfied with their health care, nearly 70% reported satisfaction with health care, while only 4.7% reported healthcare dissatisfaction.ConclusionsThe authors of this study recommend an interprofessional collaborate healthcare model be explored to address the complex and multifaceted healthcare needs of this population. Future research in this area should prospectively examine the utility of monitoring patient satisfaction in a collaborative practice setting.