'Between Combat boots and Birkenstocks'-Lessons from HIV/AIDS, SARS, H1N1 and Ebola

- Original qualitative research into weaknesses within global health response is presented.
- Interview participants were responders to public health emergencies: HIV/AIDS, SARS, H1N1 and Ebola.
- The Ebola epidemic presented unique problems; it also exposed persistent vulnerabilities plaguing global health response.
- Political and cultural clashes and policy barriers likely inhibit the global responses of WHO and CDC.

ObjectivesIn late 2013, an Ebola outbreak quickly grew into an epidemic of extraordinary magnitude, killing more people than all previous Ebola outbreaks combined. Although the epidemic was unprecedented, the world had previously experienced several acute public health emergencies requiring global coordination. HIV/AIDS, SARS and H1N1 tested global response, and in each case coordination proved problematic, making the 2013-2015 Ebola epidemic no exception. The purpose of this project was to identify persistent vulnerabilities within global public health emergency response and to identify areas for future research and improvement.Study designNon-systematic review and qualitative interview study.MethodsUsing PubMed and Google, a comprehensive search of articles connected to the HIV/AIDS, SARS, H1N1 and Ebola responses was conducted. Then, 21 key responders involved in those emergencies, primarily from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, participated in in-depth interviews. The content analysis and in-depth interview data were analysed using MAXQDA analysis software.ResultsA number of issues emerged, including cultural and political clashes within relevant agencies and a lack of confidence in those agencies, policy barriers that hinder long-term international response, a shortage of personnel and resources, itemized funding streams that limit flexibility to direct resources, and challenges to deploying responders internationally.ConclusionsThe data suggest that the world remains ill prepared to handle sustained responses and global pandemics. The study identified major vulnerabilities persistent within US-led global public health response and offers recommendations for further focused research to fully understand why these challenges persist.