Assessments of the QT/QRS restitution in perfused guinea-pig heart can discriminate safe and arrhythmogenic drugs

IntroductionDrug-induced arrhythmia remains a matter of serious clinical concern, partly due to low prognostic value of currently available arrhythmic biomarkers.MethodsThis study examined whether arrhythmogenic risks can be predicted through assessments of the rate adaptation of QT interval, ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), or the QT/QRS ratio, in perfused guinea-pig hearts.ResultsWhen the maximum restitution slope was taken as a metric of proarrhythmia, neither QT interval nor ERP measurements at progressively increased pacing rates were found to fully discriminate arrhythmogenic drugs (dofetilide, quinidine, flecainide, and procainamide) from those recognized as safe antiarrhythmics (lidocaine and mexiletine). For example, the slope of QT restitution was increased by dofetilide and quinidine, but remained unchanged by flecainide, procainamide, lidocaine, and mexiletine. With ERP rate adaptation, even though the restitution slope was increased by dofetilide, all class I agents reduced the slope value independently of their safety profile. The QRS measurements revealed variable drug effects, ranging from significant use-dependent conduction slowing (flecainide, quinidine, and procainamide) to only modest increase in QRS (lidocaine and mexiletine), or no change at all (dofetilide). However, with the QT/QRS rate adaptation, the restitution slope was significantly increased by all agents which have been reported to produce proarrhythmic effects (dofetilide, quinidine, flecainide, and procainamide), but not changed by lidocaine and mexiletine.DiscussionThese findings suggest that the slope of the QT/QRS rate adaptation can be considered as a novel electrophysiological biomarker in predicting potential arrhythmic risks associated with pharmacotherapy in cardiac patients.