کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5706971 1603729 2017 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Effect of natural sagittal trunk lean on standing balance in untreated scoliotic girls
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اثر تنه طبیعی ساجیتال تنه در تنظیم تعادل در دختران اسکولیوز درمان نشده
کلمات کلیدی
اسکولیوز، پوسیدگی، شیب تنه، عدم تعادل ایستاده، مرکز فشار، لحظه رایگان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
چکیده انگلیسی


- 27 able-bodied and 27 scoliotic girls were classified as leaning forward or backward.
- Backward scoliotic girls displayed a greater standing imbalance than the forward ones.
- Backward scoliotic girls stood more on their heels than backward able-bodied girls.
- Backward scoliotic girls could profit more from postural rehabilitation.

BackgroundGenerally, scoliotic girls have a tendency to lean further back than a comparable group of non-scoliotic girls. To date, no study has addressed how standing balance in untreated scoliotic girls is affected by a natural backwardly or forwardly inclined trunk.Methods27 able-bodied young girls and 27 young girls with a right thoracic curve were classified as leaning forward or backward according to the median of their trunk sagittal inclination. Participants stood upright barefoot. Trunk and pelvis orientations were calculated from 8 bony landmarks. Upright standing balance was assessed by 9 parameters calculated from the excursion of the center of pressure and the free moment.FindingsIn the anterior-posterior direction, backward scoliotic girls had a greater center of pressure range (P = 0.036) and speed (P = 0.015) by 10.4 mm and 2.8 mm/s respectively than the forward scoliotic group. Compared to their matching non-scoliotic group, the backward scoliotic girls stood more on their heels by 14.6 mm (P = 0.017) and display greater center of pressure speed by 2.5 mm/s (P = 0.028). Medio-lateral center of pressure range (P = 0.018) and speed (P = 0.008) were statistically higher by 8.7 mm and 3.6 mm/s for the backward group. Only the free moment RMS was significantly larger (P = 0.045) for the backward scoliotic group when compared to the forwardly inclined scoliotic group.InterpretationOnly those with a backward lean displayed statistically significant differences from both forward scoliotic girls and non-scoliotic girls. Untreated scoliotic girls with an exaggerated back extension could profit more from postural rehabilitation to improve their standing balance.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Biomechanics - Volume 49, November 2017, Pages 107-112
نویسندگان
, , , , ,