Research paperA Metacognitive model of procrastination

- Procrastination is highly prevalent in students and adults.
- Procrastination negatively impacts a wide range of psychosocial domains.
- Unintentional procrastination is strongly associated with psychopathology.
- A metacognitive model explains disparate findings from the extant literature.
- This new model suggests new treatments for unintentional procrastination.

Backgroundprocrastination refers to the delay or postponement of task or decision-making initiation or completion and is often conceptualised as a failure of self-regulation. Recent research has suggested that metacognitions play a role in procrastination and that unintentional procrastination (UP), as opposed to intentional procrastination (IP), may be the most problematic form of this behaviour. We aimed to test a metacognitive model of procrastination that was grounded in the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model.Methodsa convenience sample of 400 participants were recruited and completed (at least partially) a battery of online questionnaires that measured IP and UP, metacognitions about procrastination, depression, and Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS) configurations. Initially, we tested series of hypotheses to establish the relationships between the experimental variables and to test whether CAS configurations would independently predict UP when controlling for age, depression, IP, metacognitions about procrastination, and whether an individual reported that they had been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder.ResultsCAS configurations, depression, and metacognitions independently predicted UP. Additionally, path analysis revealed that the study data was an excellent fit to the proposed metacognitive model of procrastination.Limitationsthe study is cross-sectional.Conclusionsthe metacognitive model of procrastination presented in this paper can be used to generate novel interventions to treat this problematic behaviour.