کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5732090 | 1611940 | 2017 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- To assess the incidence of surgical site infection between chlorhexidine skin preparation and traditional skin preparation.
- Only high quality studies were selected.
- Preoperative chlorhexidine skin preparation appears to reduce the risk of infection and incidence of revision surgery.
ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aims to assess the incidences of surgical site infection of patients who applied preadmission chlorhexidine skin preparation, versus those who applied the traditional skin preparation before undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty.MethodsA systematic search is carried out through Medline (1966-2016.11), PubMed (1966-2016.11), Embase (1980-2016.11), ScienceDirect (1985-2016.11) and the Cochrane Library. Only high quality studies are identified. Meta-analysis is conducted with the use of Stata 11.0 software.ResultsOne RCT and five retrospective studies, published between 2010 and 2016, are included in the present meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis indicates that there are significant differences in surgical site infection rate (RD = â0.02, 95% CI: â0.02 to â0.01, P < 0.00001), revision surgery rate (RD = â0.01, 95% CI: â0.01 to â0.01, P < 0.00001) and length of stay (MD = â0.29, 95% CI: â0.48 to â0.11, P = 0.002) between groups.ConclusionPreoperative chlorhexidine skin preparation appears to reduce the risk of infection, the incidence of revision surgery, and the length of stay for patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty. No adverse effects, such as DVT or PE, appear to be related to chlorhexidine preparation. Due to the limited quality of the evidence currently available, high quality RCTs with better study designs, larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are needed.
Journal: International Journal of Surgery - Volume 39, March 2017, Pages 221-228