کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5751291 1619701 2017 19 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
ReviewLife cycle tools combined with multi-criteria and participatory methods for agricultural sustainability: Insights from a systematic and critical review
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
ReviewLife cycle tools combined with multi-criteria and participatory methods for agricultural sustainability: Insights from a systematic and critical review
چکیده انگلیسی


- A literature review was completed on life cycle tools with multi-criteria methods
- These tools were critically analyzed for agricultural sustainability assessment
- Specific criteria and parameters were used to highlight methodological issues
- Results show the main assets and synergies, advantages and disadvantages
- Further efforts are necessary towards the development of new integrative tools

Life cycle (LC) methodologies have attracted a great interest in agricultural sustainability assessments, even if, at the same time, they have sometimes been criticized for making unrealistic assumptions and subjective choices. To cope with these weaknesses, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and/or participatory methods can be used to balance and integrate different sustainability dimensions. The purpose of this study is to highlight how life cycle approaches were combined with MCDA and participatory methods to address agricultural sustainability in the published scientific literature. A systematic and critical review was developed, highlighting the following features: which multi-criterial and/or participatory methods have been associated with LC tools; how they have been integrated or complemented (methodological relationships); the intensity of the involvement of stakeholders (degree of participation); and which synergies have been achieved by combining the methods. The main typology of integration was represented by multi-criterial frameworks integrating LC evaluations. LC tools can provide MCDA studies with local and global information on how to reduce negative impacts and avoid burden shifts, while MCDA methods can help LC practitioners deal with subjective assumptions in an objective way, to take into consideration actors' values and to overcome trade-offs among the different dimensions of sustainability. Considerations concerning the further development of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) have been identified as well.

180

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Science of The Total Environment - Volume 595, 1 October 2017, Pages 352-370
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,