کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5802862 1555677 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of a new bead-based antibody detection test to reveal Toxoplasma gondii infections in pig populations
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
برآورد بیزی بر پایه تشخیصی یک تست تشخیص آنتی بادی مبتنی بر برش برای تشخیص عفونت توکسوپلاسما گوندی در جمعیت خوک
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم دامی و جانورشناسی
چکیده انگلیسی


- The mode of the estimated sensitivity is 0.855 (bCI 0.702-0.960).
- The mode of the estimated specificity is 0.913 (bCI 0.893-0.931).
- Because of low numbers of positives, the sensitivity value of is less precise.
- Because of high numbers of negatives, the estimated specificity value is reliable.

The success of a Toxoplasma gondii surveillance program in European pig production systems depends partly on the quality of the test to detect infection in the population. The test accuracy of a recently developed serological bead-based assay (BBA) was investigated earlier using sera from experimentally infected animals. In this study, the accuracy of the BBA was determined by the use of sera from animals from two field subpopulations. As no T. gondii infection information of these animals was available, test accuracy was determined through a Bayesian approach allowing for conditional dependency between BBA and an ELISA test. The priors for prevalence were based on available information from literature, whereas for specificity vague non-informative priors were used. Priors for sensitivity were based either on available information or specified as non-informative. Posterior estimates for BBA sensitivity and specificity were (mode) 0.855 (Bayesian 95% credibility interval (bCI) 0.702-0.960) and 0.913 (bCI 0.893-0.931), respectively. Comparing the results of BBA and ELISA, sensitivity was higher for the BBA while specificity was higher for ELISA. Alternative priors for the sensitivity affected posterior estimates for sensitivity of both BBA and ELISA, but not for specificity. Because the difference in prevalence between the two subpopulations is small, and the number of infected animals is small as well, the precision of the posterior estimates for sensitivity may be less accurate in comparison to the estimates for specificity. The estimated value for specificity of BBA is at least optimally defined for testing pigs from conventional and organic Dutch farms.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Veterinary Parasitology - Volume 207, Issues 1–2, 15 January 2015, Pages 1-6
نویسندگان
, , , , ,