Genetic perturbations that impair functional trait interactions lead to reduced bone strength and increased fragility in mice

- Genes regulate bone strength not only by regulating individual traits, but also by regulating the functional interactions among traits.
- Systematic analysis of chromosome substitution strains identified 7 chromosomes harboring genes that impair function.
- The complex adaptive nature of the skeletal system complicates the genotype-phenotype relationship, making individual traits unreliable predictors of bone fragility.
- CSSs that maintained function adjusted cortical area and tissue mineral density to expected levels for body size and robustness.
- Reduced function arose most often when chromosome substitutions disrupted the normal pattern of functional trait interactions.

Functional adaptation may complicate the choice of phenotype used in genetic studies that seek to identify genes contributing to fracture susceptibility. Often, genetic variants affecting one trait are compensated by coordinated changes in other traits. Bone fracture is a prototypic example because mechanical function of long bones (stiffness and strength) depends on how the system coordinately adjusts the amount (cortical area) and quality (tissue-mineral density, TMD) of bone tissue to mechanically offset the natural variation in bone robustness (total area/length). We propose that efforts aimed at identifying genes regulating fracture resistance will benefit from better understanding how functional adaptation contributes to the genotype-phenotype relationship. We analyzed the femurs of C57BL/6J-ChrA/J/NaJ Chromosome Substitution Strains (CSSs) to systemically interrogate the mouse genome for chromosomes harboring genes that regulate mechanical function. These CSSs (CSS-i, i = the substituted chromosome) showed changes in mechanical function on the order of −26.6 to +11.5% relative to the B6 reference strain after adjusting for body size. Seven substitutions showed altered robustness, cortical area, or TMD, but no effect on mechanical function (CSS-4, 5, 8, 9, 17, 18, 19); six substitutions showed altered robustness, cortical area, or TMD, and reduced mechanical function (CSS-1, 2, 6, 10, 12, 15); and one substitution also showed reduced mechanical function but exhibited no significant changes in the three physical traits analyzed in this study (CSS-3). A key feature that distinguished CSSs that maintained function from those with reduced function was whether the system adjusted cortical area and TMD to the levels needed to compensate for the natural variation in bone robustness. These results provide a novel biomechanical mechanism linking genotype with phenotype, indicating that genes control function not only by regulating individual traits, but also by regulating how the system coordinately adjusts multiple traits to establish function.