کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5919989 | 1164278 | 2013 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Boxfishes (superfamily Ostracioidea, order Tetraodontiformes) are comprised of 37 species within the families Aracanidae (13 sp.) and Ostracidae (24 sp.). These species are characterized by several dramatic reductive trends in their axial and appendicular skeleton, and by the presence of a carapace formed by enlarged and thickened scale plates. While strong support exists for the monophyly of both families, interspecific relationships remain unclear as no species-level molecular phylogeny currently exists for either of these two clades, and the only hypotheses of relationships are based on morphological studies that were mostly restricted to generic-level relationships. Here we present the results of a new phylogenetic study of a dataset composed of 9 loci for 26 species of boxfishes using both likelihood and Bayesian methods. Our topology strongly supports the monophyly of both groups, and additionally provides strongly supported resolution for the vast majority of species-level interrelationships. Based on this new phylogeny, we suggest changing the taxonomic status of the species Lactoria fornasini to Tetrasomus fornasini, and Rhynchostracion nasus to Ostracion nasus. Using a Bayesian approach to divergence time estimation we inferred a Paleocene origin of the Ostracioidea, with an estimated origin of the reef-associated ostraciids spanning the Eocene and Oligocene, and a Miocene/Pliocene origin of the aracanids.
Highlights⺠We construct the first molecular phylogeny of boxfishes using nine nuclear and mitochondrial genes. ⺠This study supports the monophyly of both extant families, but shows that some genera are not monophyletic. ⺠We conduct the first divergence time analysis of boxfish to date. ⺠Both ostraciid and aracanid boxfishes originated in the early Neogene. ⺠Aracanid boxfishes radiated much later (Miocene) than ostraciid boxfish, which started to diversify during the Eocene.
Journal: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution - Volume 66, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 153-160