Amiodarone and cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis

- Amiodarone significantly improves survival to hospital admission.
- Amiodarone does not improve survival to hospital discharge.
- Amiodarone does not improve neurological outcome.

IntroductionThe 2015 Guidelines for Resuscitation recommend amiodarone as the antiarrhythmic drug of choice in the treatment of resistant ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. We reviewed the effects of amiodarone on survival and neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE and Cochrane Library from 1940 to March 2016 without language restrictions. Randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies were selected.ResultsOur search initially identified 1663 studies, 1458 from MEDLINE and 205 from Cochrane Library. Of them, 4 randomized controlled studies and 6 observational studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for further review. Three randomized studies were included in the meta-analysis. Amiodarone significantly improves survival to hospital admission (OR = 1.402, 95% CI: 1.068-1.840, Z = 2.43, P = 0.015), but neither survival to hospital discharge (RR = 0.850, 95% CI: 0.631-1.144, Z = 1.07, P = 0.284) nor neurological outcome compared to placebo or nifekalant (OR = 1.114, 95% CI: 0.923-1.345, Z = 1.12, P = 0.475).ConclusionsAmiodarone significantly improves survival to hospital admission. However there is no benefit of amiodarone in survival to discharge or neurological outcomes compared to placebo or other antiarrhythmics.