کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5974143 | 1576210 | 2013 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

BackgroundUntil today, FBN1 gene mutation characteristics were not compared with clinical features for the prediction of mitral valve disease progression.MethodsTherefore, we conducted a study of 116 patients (53 men, 63 women aged 33 ± 15 years) with a causative FBN1 gene mutation and â¤Â moderate mitral valve regurgitation at baseline.ResultsDuring 7.4 ± 6.8 years 30 patients developed progression of mitral valve regurgitation â¥Â 1 grade (primary endpoint), and 26 patients required mitral valve surgery (secondary endpoint). Cox regression analysis identified an association of atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.703; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.013-7.211; P = .047), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = .970; 95%CI .944-.997; P = .032), indexed end-diastolic left ventricular diameter (HR = 15.165; 95%CI 4.498-51.128; P < .001), indexed left atrial diameter (HR = 1.107; 95%CI 1.045-1.173; P = .001), tricuspid valve prolapse (HR = 2.599; 95%CI 1.243-5.437; P = .011), posterior leaflet prolapse (HR = 1.075; 95%CI 1.023-1.130; P = .009), and posterior leaflet thickening (HR = 3.368; 95%CI 1.265-8.968; P = .015) with progression of mitral valve disease, whereas none of the FBN1 gene mutation characteristics were associated with progression of mitral valve disease. However, Cox regression analysis identified a marginal relationship of FBN1 gene mutations located both in a transforming-growth-factor beta-binding protein-like (TGFb-BP) domain (HR = 3.453; 95%CI .982-12.143; P = .053), and in the calcium-binding epidermal growth factor-like (cbEGF) domain (HR = 2.909; 95%CI .957-8.848; P = .060) with mitral valve surgery, a finding that was corroborated by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = .014; and P = .041, respectively).ConclusionClinical features were better predictors of mitral valve disease progression than FBN1 gene mutation characteristics.
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology - Volume 168, Issue 2, 30 September 2013, Pages 953-959