کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6188625 1256686 2016 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
CommentaryThe impact of physiological oxygen during culture, and vitrification for cryopreservation, on the outcome of extended culture in human IVF
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی زنان، زایمان و بهداشت زنان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
CommentaryThe impact of physiological oxygen during culture, and vitrification for cryopreservation, on the outcome of extended culture in human IVF
چکیده انگلیسی

Extended culture has facilitated the move to single blastocyst transfer, resulting in significant increases in implantation and live birth rate, while concomitantly reducing fetal loss during pregnancy. However, concerns have been raised regarding subsequent neo-natal outcomes following extended culture. Analysis of the literature reveals differences in outcomes according to geographical region and between individual clinics. A common factor amongst reports of potentially adverse outcomes following blastocyst transfer appears to be that atmospheric (~20%) oxygen was typically employed for embryo culture. Clinics and countries utilizing physiological concentrations of oxygen (~5%) have not reported adverse perinatal outcomes with blastocyst transfer. Atmospheric oxygen imposes significant negative effects upon the embryo's molecular and cellular physiology, and further it increases the sensitivity of the preimplantation embryo to other stressors in the laboratory. With the recent adoption of vitrification for blastocyst cryopreservation, cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle with extended culture will increase significantly. Consequently, rather than perceiving extended culture as a potentially negative procedure, it is concluded that neo-natal data need to be interpreted in light of the conditions used to culture and cryopreserve blastocysts, and that furthermore a policy of embryo culture using 20% oxygen can no longer be justified.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Reproductive BioMedicine Online - Volume 32, Issue 2, February 2016, Pages 137-141
نویسندگان
,