کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6251457 1611974 2015 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original researchResidents' performance in open versus laparoscopic bench-model cholecystectomy in a hands-on surgical course
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
کارآزمایی بالینی عملکرد سرانجام در کولسیستکتومی مدل پایه باز در مقابل لاپاروسکوپی در یک دوره جراحی دست ساز
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Surgical trainees have little experience in open cholecystectomy.
- Efforts should be made to enable training in open cholecystectomy.
- Impact of lack of experience in open surgery is difficult to objectify.
- Representative bench models for open cholecystectomy need to be improved.

IntroductionLaparoscopy has become the gold standard for many abdominal procedures. Among young surgeons, experience in laparoscopic surgery increasingly outweighs experience in open surgery. This study was conducted to compare residents' performance in laparoscopic versus open bench-model task.MethodsIn an international surgical skills course, we compared trainees' performance in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a cadaveric animal bench-model. Both exercises were evaluated by board-certified surgeons using an 8-item checklist and by the trainees themselves.Results238 trainees with a median surgical experience of 24 months (interquartile range 14-48) took part. Twenty-two percent of the trainees had no previous laparoscopic and 62% no previous open cholecystectomy experience. Significant differences were found in the overall score (median difference of 1 (95% CI: 1, 1), p < 0.001), gallbladder perforation rate (73% vs. 29%, p < 0.001), safe dissection of the Calot's triangle (98% vs. 90%, p = 0.001) and duration of surgery (42 (13) minutes vs. 26 (10) minutes (mean differences 17.22 (95% CI: 15.37, 19.07), p < 0.001)), all favouring open surgery. The perforation rate in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomies was not consistently decreasing with increasing years of experience or number of previously performed procedures. Self-assessment was lower than the assessment by board-certified surgeons.ConclusionDespite lower experience in open compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, better performance was observed in open task. It may be explained by a wider access with easier preparation. Open cholecystectomy is the rescue manoeuvre and therefore, it is important to provide also enough training opportunities in open surgery.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Surgery - Volume 19, July 2015, Pages 15-21
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,