کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
6267527 1614595 2016 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Two different analyzing methods for inhibitory reflexes: Do they yield comparable outcomes?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
دو روش تجزیه و تحلیل متفاوت برای رفلکس های مهاری: آیا آنها نتایج قابل مقایسه ای را انجام می دهند؟
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب (عمومی)
چکیده انگلیسی


- For the analysis of inhibitory jaw reflexes the cumulative sum (CUSUM) error box and the t-test method can be used.
- This study aimed to assess the interexaminer reliability and test whether both methods yield similar results.
- Inhibitory jaw reflexes were recorded from the right masseter muscle of 11 participants.
- The interexaminer reliability was fair-to-good to excellent. The comparability of the two analyzing methods was fair-to-good.
- When analyzing the inhibitory jaw reflex data, both the CUSUM error box and the t-test method can be used.

sBackgroundFor the analysis of inhibitory reflexes, no consensus exists regarding the methodology that should be used. The most commonly used methods are the cumulative sum (CUSUM) error box and the t-test. The aim of this study was to assess the interexaminer reliability of those two analyzing methods and to test whether both methods: yield similar results.MethodsInhibitory jaw reflexes were recorded from the right masseter muscle of 11 participants (6 males, 5 females). Electrical stimuli were applied at the hairy skin of the upper lip on the right side. In total, 16 stimuli were applied while the participants maintained their clenching level at 10% of their maximum voluntary EMG activity. Two different examiners analyzed the reflex data with two different methods: the CUSUM error box and the t-test. The outcome variables were the number of reflex parts, the reflex area size, and the reflex onset. Comparability between examiners and between the two analyzing methods: was assessed with the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsThe interexaminer reliability was fair-to-good to excellent for both the CUSUM error box and the t-test analyses and for all the variables tested. The comparability of the two analyzing methods: was fair-to-good.Comparison with existing methods/conclusionWhen analyzing the inhibitory reflex data, both the CUSUM error box and the t-test can be used.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Neuroscience Methods - Volume 274, 1 December 2016, Pages 49-52
نویسندگان
, , , , ,