کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6352237 | 1622559 | 2015 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: An assessment of quality of life using the WHOQOL-BREF among participants living in the vicinity of wind turbines An assessment of quality of life using the WHOQOL-BREF among participants living in the vicinity of wind turbines](/preview/png/6352237.png)
- Large scale Canadian wind turbine study (n=1238) yielding a 78.9% response rate.
- Randomly selected participants exposed to wide range of wind turbine noise levels.
- Scores using the WHOQOL-BREF were unrelated to wind turbine noise levels.
- Multiple regression method to quantify wind turbine noise impacts on quality of life.
- High visual annoyance to wind turbines associated with reduced quality of life.
Living within the vicinity of wind turbines may have adverse impacts on health measures associated with quality of life (QOL). There are few studies in this area and inconsistent findings preclude definitive conclusions regarding the impact that exposure to wind turbine noise (WTN) may have on QOL. In the current study (officially titled the Community Noise and Health Study or CNHS), the World Health Organization QOL-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire provided an evaluation of QOL in relation to WTN levels among randomly selected participants aged 18-79 (606 males, 632 females) living between 0.25 and 11.22Â km from wind turbines (response rate 78.9%). In the multiple regression analyses, WTN levels were not found to be related to scores on the Physical, Psychological, Social or Environment domains, or to rated QOL and Satisfaction with Health questions. However, some wind turbine-related variables were associated with scores on the WHOQOL-BREF, irrespective of WTN levels. Hearing wind turbines for less than one year (compared to not at all and greater than one year) was associated with improved (i.e. higher) scores on the Psychological domain (p=0.0108). Lower scores on both the Physical and Environment domains (p=0.0218 and p=0.0372, respectively), were observed among participants reporting high visual annoyance toward wind turbines. Personal benefit from having wind turbines in the area was related to higher scores on the Physical domain (p=0.0417). Other variables significantly related to one or more domains, included sex, age, marital status, employment, education, income, alcohol consumption, smoking status, chronic diseases and sleep disorders. Collectively, results do not support an association between exposure to WTN up to 46Â dBA and QOL assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire.
Journal: Environmental Research - Volume 142, October 2015, Pages 227-238