On the behavior of certain ink aging curves

- A decreasing ink aging curve is not expected to have regions where it increases.
- Several factors can cause it to happen (e.g., varying storage conditions).
- Incomplete extraction of the analyte being measured can cause such behavior.
- Known mass-invariant ink dating methods are discussed.

This work treats writing inks, particularly ballpoint pen inks. It reviews those ink aging methods that are based on the analysis (measurement) of ink solvents (e.g., 2-phenoxyethanol, which is the most common among ballpoint pen inks). Each method involves measurements that are components of an ink aging parameter associated with the method. Only mass independent parameters are considered. An ink solvent from an ink that is on an air-exposed substrate will evaporate at a decreasing rate and is never constant as the ink ages. An ink aging parameter should reflect this behavior. That is, the graph of a parameter's experimentally-determined values plotted against ink age (which yields the ink aging curve) should show this behavior. However, some experimentally-determined aging curves contain outlying points that are below or above where they should be or points corresponding to different ages that have the same ordinate (parameter value). Such curves, unfortunately, are useless since such curves show that an ink can appear older or younger than what it should be in one or more of its points or have the same age in two or more of its points. This work explains that one cause of this unexpected behavior is that the parameter values were improperly determined such as when a measurement is made of an ink solvent that is not completely extracted (removed) from an ink sample with a chosen extractor such as dry heat or a solvent.