کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6463668 | 1362123 | 2016 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Recognition of business risks and opportunities related to BES has boosted managerial interest on these issues.
- Transforming the existing management reporting systems to provide information on BES is often a challenge for companies.
- Environmental performance indicators (EPIs) should provide information on all life-cycle phases of products and services.
- EPIs should also be applicable in communicating positive and negative, direct and indirect impacts of businesses.
- At the moment forest industry companies are focusing in their communication mostly on their positive efforts towards BES.
Recognizing business risks and opportunities associated with biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES) has triggered a need for identifying, measuring, monitoring and developing business management on these issues to meet stakeholder needs. The extractive industries with direct impacts and dependence on BES are particularly apt to encounter stakeholder pressures for profound corporate responsibility (CR) reporting. In our study, we investigate how global forest industry companies address BES in supply chain management through CR reporting practices in reference to 30 environmental performance indicators (EPIs) of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines. The objectives of this study are: to identify the information content of the GRI EPIs for assessing directly or indirectly positive or negative impacts of companies' operations on BES; to examine the environmental strategies of these companies in relation to BES and supply chain management; and to identify needs and possibilities of indicator development. The material of the study comprises CR reports of thirteen large forest industry companies in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index analyzed with content analysis. According to the results, companies tend to disclose indirect BES impacts over direct ones, emphasize corporations' positive achievements over negative consequences, and focus on the supply chain in upstream activities rather than in downstream activities.
Journal: Ecosystem Services - Volume 21, Part A, October 2016, Pages 130-140