کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
680757 1459990 2014 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Bioleaching of a low-grade nickel–copper sulfide by mixture of four thermophiles
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
از بین بردن یک سولفید نیکل مس کم با مخلوطی از چهار ترموفیل
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی تکنولوژی و شیمی فرآیندی
چکیده انگلیسی


• A first study applying mixture of thermophiles in nickel–copper sulfide bioleaching.
• A first study on community succession during nickel–copper sulfide bioleaching.
• l-Cysteine contributed to higher ORP, zeta potential, cell amount and lower pH value.
• Ni recovery was always higher than that of Cu and l-cysteine promoted them both.
• Without l-cysteine, S. m dominated while A. m dominated when l-cysteine added.

This study investigated thermophilic bioleaching of a low grade nickel–copper sulfide using mixture of four acidophilic thermophiles. Effects of 0.2 g/L l-cysteine on the bioleaching process were further evaluated. It aimed at offering new alternatives for enhancing metal recoveries from nickel–copper sulfide. Results showed a recovery of 80.4% nickel and 68.2% copper in 16-day bioleaching without l-cysteine; while 83.7% nickel and 81.4% copper were recovered in the presence of l-cysteine. Moreover, nickel recovery was always higher than copper recovery. l-Cysteine was found contributing to lower pH value, faster microbial growth, higher Oxidation–Reduction Potential (ORP), higher zeta potential and absorbing on the sulfide surfaces through amino, carboxyl and sulfhydryl groups. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns of leached residues showed generation of S, jarosite and ammoniojarosite. Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) results revealed that l-cysteine could have variant impacts on different microorganisms and changed the microbial community composition dramatically during nickel–copper sulfide bioleaching.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Bioresource Technology - Volume 153, February 2014, Pages 300–306
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,