کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
7291600 | 1474220 | 2016 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Judgments of learning are significantly higher following feedback on relatively good versus relatively poor trials despite no actual learning differences
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
قضاوت های یادگیری به طور قابل توجهی بالاتر از بازخورد در مورد آزمون های نسبتا خوب در مقابل نسبتا ضعیف است با وجود تفاوت های یادگیری واقعی
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
کسب مهارت، یادگیری موتور، آگاهی از نتایج، فراشناخت،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علم عصب شناسی
علوم اعصاب شناختی
چکیده انگلیسی
Studies have consistently shown that prospective metacognitive judgments of learning are often inaccurate because humans mistakenly interpret current performance levels as valid indices of learning. These metacognitive discrepancies are strongly related to conditions of practice. Here, we examined how the type of feedback (after good versus poor trials) received during practice and awareness (aware versus unaware) of this manipulation affected judgments of learning and actual learning. After each six-trial block, participants received feedback on their three best trials or three worst trials and half of the participants were made explicitly aware of the type of feedback they received while the other half were unaware. Judgments of learning were made at the end of each six-trial block and before the 24-h retention test. Results indicated no motor performance differences between groups in practice or retention; however, receiving feedback on relatively good compared to relatively poor trials resulted in significantly higher judgments of learning in practice and retention, irrespective of awareness. These results suggest that KR on relatively good versus relatively poor trials can have dissociable effects on judgments of learning in the absence of actual learning differences, even when participants are made aware of their feedback manipulation.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Human Movement Science - Volume 45, February 2016, Pages 63-70
Journal: Human Movement Science - Volume 45, February 2016, Pages 63-70
نویسندگان
Michael J. Carter, Victoria Smith, Diane M. Ste-Marie,