کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
7338641 | 1476103 | 2018 | 40 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Gender, expert advice, and judicial gatekeeping in the United States
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
جنسیت، مشاوره متخصص و حکم قضایی در ایالات متحده
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
جنسیت، قانون، تجربه و تخصص، تصمیم سازی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
روانشناسی
روانشناسی اجتماعی
چکیده انگلیسی
This article investigates the role of gender in decision-making by examining trial judges' decisions to admit or exclude expert witness testimony. An analysis of civil rights cases in United States district courts (nâ¯=â¯198) reveals that male judges are substantially more likely than females to exclude expert evidence. Importantly, this pattern cannot be attributed to other characteristics of judges, experts, or courts that may influence judges' rulings. These findings are consistent with theories of gender, organizations, and science that suggest that women are more likely than men to consider expert advice. These results also indicate that the organizational role of trial judge may not be enough to offset the wider effects of the gender system on perceptions of experts.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Social Science Research - Volume 72, May 2018, Pages 134-145
Journal: Social Science Research - Volume 72, May 2018, Pages 134-145
نویسندگان
Timothy L. O'Brien,