Fracture toughness of esthetic dental coating systems by nanoindentation and FIB sectional analysis

• Esthetic ceramic based coating systems for dental implants.
• Nanoindentation was conducted using a cube corner tip.
• The extent of fracture after indentation was analyzed using SEM and FIB.
• Two evaluation models were used to calculate the fracture toughness.

Improving the esthetics of Ti-based dental implants is the last challenge remaining in the optimization process. The optical issues were recently solved by the application of highly and selectively reflective coatings on Ti implants. This work focuses on the mechanical durability of these esthetic ceramic based coating systems (with and without adhesion layers).The coating systems (Ti–ZrO2, Ti–Al–ZrO2, Ti–Ti–Al–ZrO2, Ti–Ag–ZrO2, Ti–Ti–Ag–ZrO2, Ti–Bragg and Ti–TiO2–Bragg) were subjected to nanoindentation experiments and examined using scanning electron microscopy and focused ion beam cross sectional analysis. Three coating systems contained adhesion layers (10 nm of Ti or 60 nm of TiO2 layers). The fracture toughness of selected samples was assessed applying two different models from literature, a classical for bulk materials and an energy-based model, which was further developed and adjusted.The ZrO2 based coating systems (total film thickness<200 nm) followed a circumferential cracking behavior in contrast to Bragg coated samples (total film thickness around 1.5 μm), which showed radial cracking emanating from the indent corners. For Ti–ZrO2 samples, a fracture toughness between 2.70 and 3.70 MPa m1/2 was calculated using an energy-based model. The classical model was applied to Bragg coated samples and their fracture toughness ranged between 0.70 and 0.80 MPa m1/2. Furthermore, coating systems containing an additional layer (Ti–Ti–Al–ZrO2, Ti–Ti–Ag–ZrO2 and Ti–TiO2-Bragg) showed an improved adhesion between the substrate and the coating.The addition of a Ti or TiO2 layer improved the adhesion between substrate and coating. The validity of the models for the assessment of the fracture toughness depended on the layer structure and fracture profile of the samples investigated here (classical model for thick coatings and energy-based model for thin coatings).

Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (299 K)Download as PowerPoint slide