Influence of size, surface coating and fine chemical composition on the in vitro reactivity and in vivo biodistribution of lipid nanocapsules versus lipid nanoemulsions in cancer models

Lipid nanocapsules (LNCs) and lipid nanoemulsions (LNEs) are biomimetic synthetic nanocarriers. Their in vitro and in vivo performance was evaluated as a function of their size (25, 50 and 100 nm) and the surface PEG chain length. Analysis methods included complement activation test, particle uptake in macrophage and HEK293(β3) cells and biodistribution studies with tumor-grafted mice by fluorescence imaging. A particular attention was paid to keep the concentration of each nanocarrier and to the amount of fluorescent dye in comparable conditions between the in vitro and in vivo studies. Under these conditions, no significant differences were found among the three tested particle sizes and the two nanocarrier types. Longer PEG chains on the LNE surface provided better stealth properties, whereas PEG modification on the LNC formulations inhibited the production of stable nanocarriers. Passive accumulation of LNCs and LNEs in different tumor types depended on the degree of tumor vascularization.From the Clinical EditorThis study of lipid nanocapsules and lipid nanoemulsions compares their vitro and in vivo performance as a function of size and surface PEG chain length, demonstrating no significant difference among the tested particle sizes. Longer PEG chains on the LNE surface provided better stealth properties, whereas PEG modification on the LNC formulations inhibited the production of stable nanocarriers.

Graphical AbstractIf the diameter of the nanoemulsions varies between 25 and 100 nm, they will accumulate equally in a given type of subcutaneous tumors. However, this passive accumulation due to the EPR effect (enhanced permeability and retention effect) will vary very significantly between different tumor types.Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (154 K)Download as PowerPoint slide