کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
891077 | 914021 | 2013 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Eysenck proposed that psychopathy is at the extreme end of the Psychoticism (P) personality dimension (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1976). This study examined (i) whether psychopathy-relevant P items of the EPQ-R can form psychometrically valid facets that map onto the conceptualization of the two-, three- or four-factor models of psychopathy using confirmatory factor analysis (N = 577) in a normal population; and (ii) whether those P-facets have criteria-related validity in associations with self-reported primary and secondary psychopathy, impulsivity (subsample N = 306), and measures of trait empathy and aggression (subsample N = 212). The four-factor model incorporating affective, interpersonal, impulsive, and antisocial facets of P was superior to the two-factor model; however, the three-factor conceptualization excluding the antisocial P-facet was the best fit. The facets show predicted divergent associations with primary and secondary self-reported psychopathy and trait measures. Findings are discussed in light of Eysenck’s P-psychopathy continuity hypothesis and the applicability of facet approaches to the prediction of psychopathic and antisocial tendencies.
► An examination of psychopathy related facets in EPQ-R Psychoticism (P).
► Confirmatory factor analyses of the 2, 3 and 4 factor models of psychopathy in P.
► Support the 4 factor model over 2 factor model, but 3 factor model had best fit.
► P-facets show predicted divergent associations with psychopathy related traits.
► Linked to high psychopathy, impulsivity and aggression, and low empathy.
Journal: Personality and Individual Differences - Volume 54, Issue 6, April 2013, Pages 773–778