کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
8940577 1644831 2018 15 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Mapping soil compaction - A review
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
نقشه برداری تراکم خاک - بررسی
کلمات کلیدی
تراکم خاک، نقشه برداری تراکم خاک، تنوع فضایی، فرایندهای جریان پرشور،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم محیط زیست شیمی زیست محیطی
چکیده انگلیسی
Land degradation due to soil compaction is a widespread phenomenon. Delineating maps of topsoil compaction is a challenging task due to its dynamic nature, which is highly variable in time and space. This review paper sheds light on existing approaches and methods of mapping soil compaction. At the plot scale, there are three ways of doing so: (1) Direct measurement of penetration resistance (PR) and electrical conductivity, which can be scaled up using geostatistical approaches or georeferenced data; (2) calculation of vertical stress, taking into account the total load and contact area, soil characteristics, and machine load; and (3) computation of the pre-consolidation stress from pedo-transfer functions based on key soil properties obtained from available databases. At larger scales, indirect relationships are used to predict risk of compaction based on measured values, such as PR values, soil moisture, or organic matter, combined with a cartographic depth-to-water index derived from a light detection and ranging technique or other digital elevation model approaches. Among the examples we provide a 3D mapping based on the TASC (Tyres/Tracks And Soil Compaction) model, which opens new avenues in mapping methodology for helping practitioners, advisers, and policymakers to mitigate soil compaction. Since subsoil compaction can persist over decades, indicating a long memory effect (especially in the case of afforestation), knowledge of previous land uses must be taken into account for mapping areas subject to soil damage. Multi-stakeholder engagement can help to compile this information.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health - Volume 5, October 2018, Pages 60-66
نویسندگان
, ,