کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
901329 | 915861 | 2011 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) is known to be effective for a number of disorders, and can be delivered effectively by trainees in controlled settings. However, the effectiveness of trainee therapists in general practice compared to that of more experienced therapists is unknown. In this study, the authors used a benchmarking strategy to compare the outcomes of naturalistic CBT delivered by trainee therapists to those of efficacy and effectiveness studies using primarily professional therapists. Patients (N = 249) with mood and anxiety disorders were treated by trainees (primarily by interns and postdocs) using nonstandardized nonmanualized CBT at an outpatient clinic in an urban academic medical center. Changes in anxiety and depression were assessed using effect sizes, reliable and clinically significant change, and benchmarked to efficacy and effectiveness studies. Symptoms of anxiety and depression significantly improved from start to end of treatment. Rates of improvement and recovery compared favorably to those achieved in other studies, with the exception of recovery rates in severe depression. Effect sizes were in the medium to large range, but generally lower than those achieved in other studies. Results suggest that CBT can be delivered effectively by trainees in an outpatient setting.
► We compare outcomes of CBT delivered by trainee therapists to those of published efficacy and effectiveness studies.
► Comparisons use effect sizes and rates of reliable change and recovery for depression and anxiety disorders.
► Effect sizes and rates of recovery are comparable to effectiveness studies, but lower than those in efficacy studies
► Results show that trainees can provide effective CBT.
Journal: Behavior Therapy - Volume 42, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages 612–623