Developmental origins of recoding and decoding in memory

• Toddlers mentally chunked objects and learned novel verbal labels for the chunks.
• Later, they used just the verbal labels to infer how many objects were hidden.
• These recoding/decoding processes expanded the number of items children remembered.
• Children’s success did not depend on their counting proficiency.
• Efficient recoding and decoding in memory are present early in development.

Working memory is severely limited in both adults and children, but one way that adults can overcome this limit is through the process of recoding. Recoding happens when representations of individual items are chunked together into a higher order representation, and the chunk is assigned a label. That label can then be decoded to retrieve the individual items from long-term memory. Whereas this ability has been extensively studied in adults (as, for example, in classic studies of memory in chess), little is known about recoding’s developmental origins. Here we asked whether 2- to 3-year-old children also can recode—that is, can they restructure representations of individual objects into a higher order chunk, assign this new representation a verbal label, and then later decode the label to retrieve the represented individuals from memory. In Experiments 1 and 2, we showed children identical blocks that could be connected to make tools. Children learned a novel name for a tool that could be built from two blocks, and for a tool that could be built from three blocks. Later we told children that one of the tools was hidden in a box, with no visual information provided. Children were allowed to search the box and retrieve varying numbers of blocks. Critically, the retrieved blocks were identical and unconnected, so the only way children could know whether any blocks remained was by using the verbal label to recall how many objects comprised each tool (or chunk). We found that even children who could not yet count adjusted their searching of the box depending on the label they had heard. This suggests that they had recoded representations of individual blocks into higher-order chunks, attached labels to the chunks, and then later decoded the labels to infer how many blocks were hidden. In Experiments 3 and 4 we asked whether recoding also can expand the number of individual objects children could remember, as in the classic studies with adults. We found that when no information was provided to support recoding, children showed the standard failure to remember more than three hidden objects at once. But when provided recoding information, children successfully represented up to five individual objects in the box, thereby overcoming typical working memory limits. These results are the first demonstration of recoding by young children; we close by discussing their implications for understanding the structure of memory throughout the lifespan.