کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
9256980 | 1211855 | 2005 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: When Endoscopic Therapy Fails-A Surgeon's Perspective
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
بیماریهای گوارشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Endoscopic hemostasis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding has dramatically reduced the need for surgical management over the past two decades. Nevertheless, surgery still plays a pivotal role. Initial endoscopy stops bleeding in over 90% of cases and allows stratification of patients by their risk of rebleeding. Patients who are at high risk of rebleeding are the elderly with comorbidities; those presenting with shock or a large ulcer; and those who have active bleeding or a nonbleeding visible vessel. In cases of rebleeding after initial success at endoscopic hemostasis, a second endoscopic attempt is justified. Failure to control bleeding endoscopically is the indication for surgical intervention, thus a close cooperation between endoscopists and surgeons is essential. When indicated, surgery should not be delayed.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Volume 7, Issue 3, July 2005, Pages 156-159
Journal: Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Volume 7, Issue 3, July 2005, Pages 156-159
نویسندگان
Kevork K. MD, Oscar J. MD,