The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking

Although widely studied in other domains, relatively little is known about the metacognitive processes that monitor and control behaviour during reasoning and decision-making. In this paper, we examined the conditions under which two fluency cues are used to monitor initial reasoning: answer fluency, or the speed with which the initial, intuitive answer is produced ( Thompson, Prowse Turner, & Pennycook, 2011), and perceptual fluency, or the ease with which problems can be read ( Alter, Oppenheimer, Epley, & Eyre, 2007). The first two experiments demonstrated that answer fluency reliably predicted Feeling of Rightness (FOR) judgments to conditional inferences and base rate problems, which subsequently predicted the amount of deliberate processing as measured by thinking time and answer changes; answer fluency also predicted retrospective confidence judgments (Experiment 3b). Moreover, the effect of answer fluency on reasoning was independent from the effect of perceptual fluency, establishing that these are empirically independent constructs. In five experiments with a variety of reasoning problems similar to those of Alter et al. (2007), we found no effect of perceptual fluency on FOR, retrospective confidence or accuracy; however, we did observe that participants spent more time thinking about hard to read stimuli, although this additional time did not result in answer changes. In our final two experiments, we found that perceptual disfluency increased accuracy on the CRT (Frederick, 2005), but only amongst participants of high cognitive ability. As Alter et al.’s samples were gathered from prestigious universities, collectively, the data to this point suggest that perceptual fluency prompts additional processing in general, but this processing may results in higher accuracy only for the most cognitively able.

► Applied metacognitive analysis to explain reliance on intuitive vs analytic modes of thinking.
► Examined two fluency heuristics as the basis of metacognitive judgments in reasoning.
► Answer fluency reliably predicted metacognitive judgments, which predicted analytic thinking.
► Failed to replicate Alter, Oppenheimer, Epley, and Eyre (2007) that perceptual disfluency prompts correct answers.
► Except among those of high cognitive ability.