کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
931283 | 1474440 | 2012 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Emotional pictures elicit responses across experiential, behavioral and physiological systems. The magnitude of these responses can be modulated by altering one's interpretation of emotional stimuli. Previous studies have indicated that appraisal frames affect subsequent interpretations of upcoming stimuli so as to alter self-reported emotions, ERP activity and autonomic responses. No studies to date have examined the effect of appraisal frames on expressive behaviors as measured by facial EMG. This study aims to test the hypothesis that appraisal frames can alter both emotional experience and facial expression and attempts to examine their effect on the temporal unfolding of facial expressions. Participants (N = 20) were exposed to 125 pairs of appraisal frames (neutral or negative/positive) followed by neutral, unpleasant, or pleasant pictures reflecting five conditions: unpleasant-negative, unpleasant-neutral, pleasant-positive, pleasant-neutral and neutral-neutral. Results indicate that the unpleasant-negative compared to the unpleasant-neutral condition led to greater self-reported unpleasantness and arousal, as well as greater corrugator activity, and the pleasant-positive compared to the pleasant-neutral condition led to greater self-reported pleasantness and zygomaticus activity; modulation of facial responses became evident 0.5–1.0 s after stimulus onset. These results suggest that appraisal frames effectively alter both emotional experience and facial expressions.
► We examine effect of appraisal frames on emotional experience and expression.
► Appraisal frames alter subjective experience evoked by emotional stimuli.
► Appraisal frames rapidly affect facial EMG activity.
► Corrugator supercilii muscle is sensitive to regulation of negative emotion.
► Zygomaticus major muscle is sensitive to regulation of positive emotion.
Journal: International Journal of Psychophysiology - Volume 85, Issue 2, August 2012, Pages 224–229