کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
944828 | 925712 | 2013 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Optimally interpreting our situations and experiences frequently requires comparing the evidence supporting conflicting hypotheses and deciding which to accept. This decision is comparable to an “Aha!” moment reached during insightful problem solving. We used a probabilistic reasoning task to investigate the neural activity underlying these processes. Participants rated the probability that a given focal hypothesis, rather than its alternative, was true. Decisions to accept the focal hypothesis elicited a stronger signal than decisions to reject it in a network involving the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and functionally connected frontal, parietal, and occipital regions. Follow-up analyses suggested that this was not simply a higher overall level of activation within the dACC or other individual regions of the network, but reflected a stronger signal for the network as a whole. This result is discussed in terms of functional connectivity between the dACC and other brain regions as a possible mechanism for coherence between components of a mental representation.
► We used fMRI-CPCA to study networks involved in probabilistic reasoning.
► A dACC-based network was most active during decisions to accept hypotheses.
► This was a whole-network effect, depedent on off-peak voxels and other clusters.
Journal: Neuropsychologia - Volume 51, Issue 6, May 2013, Pages 1132–1141