کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
985039 | 1480592 | 2011 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Cross-sectional studies typically find positive correlations between free availability of scientific articles (‘open access’) and citations. Using a number of instruments as plausible sources of exogeneous variation, we find no evidence for a causal effect of open access on citations. We provide theory and evidence suggesting that authors of higher quality papers are more likely to choose open access in hybrid journals which offer an open access option. Self-selection mechanisms may thus explain the discrepancy between the positive correlation found in Eysenbach (2006) and other cross-sectional studies and the absence of such correlation in the field experiment of Davis et al. (2008).
► We provide theory and evidence suggesting that authors of higher quality papers are more likely to pay for open access.
► Using instrumental variables, we find no evidence for a causal effect of open access on citations.
► Self-selection may explain the discrepancy between cross-sectional studies and the field experiment of Davis et al. (2008).
Journal: Research Policy - Volume 40, Issue 10, December 2011, Pages 1332–1338