Changing the view of wind power development: More than “bricolage”

Understanding innovation depends at root on good qualitative descriptions. This paper re-assesses the role of “bricolage”, and the extent of science-based R&D and experience-based learning, in the development of the Danish wind turbine system. It argues that the competition between these two opposed frames of reference was never conclusively settled, but involved a reassertion of science-based R&D, which was ultimately decisive for long-term success. This adds a dimension to the received account by showing the persistence of contested collective frames of reference as a driving force across the technology life cycle. At the same time, a more nuanced account of these two learning processes enhances theorisation of the innovation process by showing a learning sequence and interplay of modes that is diametrically at odds with the conventional stylised model of the experience curve.

► Re-appraises bricolage in the long-term development of the Danish wind turbine system.
► Provides a more nuanced account of science-based R&D and experience-based learning.
► Shows learning sequences diametrically at odds with the experience curve model.
► Suggests the changing nature of learning in formative, take-off and TIS growth phases.
► Affirms contested frames of reference as a driving force in the technology life cycle.