Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Guidelines; Quality of evidence; Systematic reviews; Thresholds; Thromboprophylaxis;
مقالات ISI کیفیت شواهد (ترجمه نشده)
مقالات زیر هنوز به فارسی ترجمه نشده اند.
در صورتی که به ترجمه آماده هر یک از مقالات زیر نیاز داشته باشید، می توانید سفارش دهید تا مترجمان با تجربه این مجموعه در اسرع وقت آن را برای شما ترجمه نمایند.
در صورتی که به ترجمه آماده هر یک از مقالات زیر نیاز داشته باشید، می توانید سفارش دهید تا مترجمان با تجربه این مجموعه در اسرع وقت آن را برای شما ترجمه نمایند.
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Quality of evidence; heart failure; information communication technology;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Evidence-based practice; Hierarchy of evidence; Quality of evidence; Applicability of evidence; Evidence-based medicine; Levels of evidence;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Evidence-based medicine; Quality of evidence; Atypical antipsychotics; Aripiprazole; Risperidone; Olanzapine; Quetiapine;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Quality of evidence; Hazardous substances; Environmental protection;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Systematic reviews; Quality of evidence; First trial; Effect estimates; stability of treatment effects;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Meta-analysis (MA); Quality of evidence; Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM); Systematic review; TCM review; Cochrane review;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Systematic reviews; Quality of evidence; Predictive validity; Stability of effects; Strength of evidence; Methods study;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Systematic reviews; Quality of evidence; Survey; Stability of treatment effects; Certainty of treatment effects;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Automatic summarization; Quality of evidence; Information retrieval;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Pulmonary rehabilitation; Quality of life; Self-management; Quality of evidence;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Qualität der Evidenz; Stärke der Evidenz; Leitlinienentwicklung; Einstufung von Evidenz; EmpfehlungenGRADE; quality of evidence; strength of evidence; guideline development; grading; recommendations
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Clinical practice guidelines; Primary care; Quality of evidence; Review; Health technology assessment; Strength of recommendations;
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Comparative effectiveness; Systematic reviews; Observational studies; Quality of evidence; Strength of evidence; GRADE;
A review of NICE appraisals of pharmaceuticals 2000-2016 found variation in establishing comparative clinical effectiveness
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Single-arm trials; Uncontrolled trial; Drug approval; Nonrandomized studies; Quality of evidence; National Institute of Health and Care Excellence;
Larger effect sizes in nonrandomized studies are associated with higher rates of EMA licensing approval
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Dramatic effects; Randomized trials; Nonrandomized studies; Drug Approval; Quality of evidence; Regulatory agencies;
Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Quality of evidence; Network meta-analysis; Indirect comparisons; Certainty of evidence; Confidence in estimates of effect;
Synthesizing and Appraising the Quality of the Evidence on Factors Associated with Medication Adherence in Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; diabetes; barriers; facilitators; medication adherence; quality of evidence; systematic review of systematic reviews;
Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Imprecision; Quality of evidence; Confidence in estimate; Accuracy; Conclusiveness;
Evidence Underlying KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Guideline Recommendations: A Systematic Review
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Evidence-based medicine; renal; kidney disease; nephrology; clinical practice guidelines; KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes); quality of evidence; strength of recommendation;
Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached “high” GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Complex interventions; Systematic reviews; Quality of evidence; Summary of findings tables; The Cochrane Collaboration;
Guidelines on vitamin D replacement in bariatric surgery: Identification and systematic appraisal
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Bariatric surgery; Clinical practice guidelines; Vitamin D replacement; Quality of evidence; Appraisal tool;
An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Review; Overview; Algorithm; Methodology; Quality of evidence;
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Quality of evidence; Systematic reviews; Health technology assessment; Risk of bias; Summary of findings tables; GRADEpro;
Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Certainty of evidence; Optimal information size; Quality of evidence; Review information size; Systematic reviews;
What Is the Level of Evidence Substantiating the Medicare Local Coverage Determinations?
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; total joint arthroplasty; recovery audit contractors; Local Coverage Determinations; level of evidence; quality of evidence; non-operative treatment
Acting on black box warnings requires a GRADE evidence table and an implementation guide: the case of teriparatide
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Black box warning; Teriparatide; Osteosarcoma; Evidence-based practice; GRADE; Implementation; Quality of evidence;
Quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong GRADE guidelines recommendation
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Quality of evidence; Practice guidelines; Practice recommendations; Evidence-based medicine; Guideline development; trustworthy guidelines; quality improvement;
A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: VII
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Clinical practice guidelines; GRADE approach; recommendation; quality of evidence; strength of recommendations; patients' values and preferences; evidence-based dentistry; AAOMS; American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons; AAOS; American Ac
Using GRADE for evaluating the quality of evidence in hyperbaric oxygen therapy clarifies evidence limitations
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Clinical practice guidelines; GRADE; American Heart Association; Hyperbaric oxygen therapy; Umbrella systematic review; Systematic review; Quality of evidence;
Grade Leitlinien: 15. Von der Evidenz zur Empfehlung – Determinanten, die Richtung und Stärke einer Empfehlung bestimmen
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Qualität der Evidenz; Stärke der Evidenz; Leitlinienentwicklung; Empfehlungen; EvidenzGRADE; quality of evidence; strength of evidence; guideline development; recommendation; evidence
GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Quality of evidence; Confidence in estimates; Guideline methodology; Systematic review methodology; Values and preferences;
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Quality of evidence; Strength of evidence; Guideline development; Grading; Recommendations;
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Quality of evidence; Strength of evidence; Guideline development; Recommendation; Evidence;
GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Economic evaluations; Costs; Quality of evidence; Risk of bias; Health technology assessment;
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables-binary outcomes
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Summary of findings; Evidence profile; Confidence in estimates; Quality of evidence; Systematic reviews;
GRADE-Leitlinien: 11. Gesamtbeurteilung des Vertrauens in Effektschätzer für einen einzelnen Studienendpunkt und für alle Endpunkte
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Qualität der Evidenz; Vertrauen in Effektschätzer; Methodik von Leitlinien; Methodik Systematischer Reviews; Werte und PräferenzenGRADE; quality of evidence; confidence in estimates; guideline methodology; systematic review methodology; values and
GRADE-Leitlinien: 10. Den Ressourcenverbrauch berücksichtigen und die Qualität ökonomischer Evidenz bewerten
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; ökonomische Evaluationen; Kosten; Qualität der Evidenz; Risiko für Bias; Health Technology AssessmentGRADE; economic evaluations; costs; quality of evidence; risk of bias; health technology assessment
GRADE-Leitlinien: 12. Erstellen von „Summary-of-Findings“-Tabellen – Dichotome Endpunkte
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Summary-of-Findings-Tabellen; Evidenzprofil; Vertrauen in Effektschätzer; Qualität der Evidenz; Systematische ÜbersichtsarbeitenGRADE; summary of findings; evidence profile; confidence in estimates; quality of evidence; systematic reviews
GRADE Leitlinien: 5. Einschätzung der Qualität der Evidenz – Publikationsbias
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Qualität der Evidenz; Systematische Reviews; Publikationsbias; Vertrauen in die EffektschätzerGRADE; quality of evidence; systematic reviews; publication bias; confidence in estimates
GRADE-Leitlinien: 2. Formulierung der Fragestellung und Entscheidung über wichtige Endpunkte
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; PICO; Patientenrelevante Endpunkte; Surrogatendpunkte; Leitlinienentwicklung; Qualität der Evidenz; IndirektheitGRADE; PICO; patient-important outcomes; surrogate; guideline development; quality of evidence; indirectness
GRADE-Leitlinien: 3. Bewertung der Qualität der Evidenz (Vertrauen in die Effektschätzer)
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Qualitätsbewertung; Evidenzkörper; fehlende Präzision; Indirektheit; Inkonsistenz; PublikationsbiasGRADE; quality of evidence; body of evidence; imprecision; indirectness; inconsistency; publication bias
GRADE Leitlinien: 7. Einschätzung der Qualität der Evidenz – Inkonsistenz
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Qualitätsbewertung; Evidenzkörper; Inkonsistenz; Heterogenität; SubgruppenanalysenGRADE; quality of evidence; body of evidence; inconsistency; heterogeneity; subgroup analysis
GRADE-Leitlinien: 1. Einführung – GRADE-Evidenzprofile und Summary-of-Findings-Tabellen
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; systematische Übersichtsarbeiten; Leitlinien; HTA-Berichte; Qualität der Evidenz; EmpfehlungsstärkeGRADE; systematic reviews; clinical practice guidelines; health technology assessment; quality of evidence; strength of recommendation
GRADE-Leitlinien: 4. Bewertung der Qualität der Evidenz – Studienlimitationen (Risiko für Bias)
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Qualität der Evidenz; Risiko für Bias; Vertrauen in Schätzer; Verblindung; Geheimhaltung der BehandlungsfolgeGRADE; quality of evidence; risk of bias; confidence in estimates; blinding; allocation concealment
Is the Evidence Supporting Dental Procedures Strong? A Survey of Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Oral Health
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; Systematic review; Cochrane; Quality of evidence; Evidence-based dentistry; Decision making;
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; PICO; Patient-important outcomes; Surrogate; Guideline development; Quality of evidence; Indirectness
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Quality of evidence; Publication bias; Funnel plot; Conflict of interest; Pharmaceutical industry
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; Quality of evidence; Indirectness; Indirect comparisons; Applicability; Generalizability
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Keywords: کیفیت شواهد; GRADE; quality of evidence; risk of bias; confidence in estimates; blinding; concealment