Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Cardiac rehabilitation; Exercise training; Heart disease;
مقالات ISI بررسی های سیستماتیک (ترجمه نشده)
مقالات زیر هنوز به فارسی ترجمه نشده اند.
در صورتی که به ترجمه آماده هر یک از مقالات زیر نیاز داشته باشید، می توانید سفارش دهید تا مترجمان با تجربه این مجموعه در اسرع وقت آن را برای شما ترجمه نمایند.
در صورتی که به ترجمه آماده هر یک از مقالات زیر نیاز داشته باشید، می توانید سفارش دهید تا مترجمان با تجربه این مجموعه در اسرع وقت آن را برای شما ترجمه نمایند.
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Angina pectoris; Oral medicine; Proprietary medicine; Overview; Systematic reviews; Meta-analyses;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; ADA; American Dental Association; AER; ADA evidence reviewersas; CPG; clinical practice guideline; CR; clinical recommendation also known as; CSA; ADA's Council on Scientific Affairs; CS; critical summary; EBD; evidence-based dentistry; IOM; Institute of
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Evidence-based dentistry; Prosthodontics; Guidelines; Systematic reviews; Randomized controlled clinical trials; Prospective studies; Retrospective studies;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Knowledge synthesis; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; Agri-food public health;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Acupuncture; Acupressure; CAM; Pregnancy and childbirth; Labour and birth; CAM for labour and birth; Systematic reviews; Pragmatic trials; Intervention cascade;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Conservation agriculture; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; Zero-tillage; Crop yield; Crop residues; Mulching; Sub-Saharan Africa; South Asia
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Health priorities; Hip fractures; Rehabilitation; Systematic reviews; Older people; Collaboration;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Clinical practice guidelines; Systematic reviews; Quality; AMSTAR; Endocrinology;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Evaluation; Complex interventions; Complexity; Evidence synthesis; Qualitative research;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Risk of bias; Nonrandomized studies; Systematic reviews; Reliability; Validity; Validation studies;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Reporting; Quality; Abstracts; Systematic reviews;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; methodology; complex interventions; mixed-methods research; evaluation;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Complex interventions; Heterogeneity; Systematic reviews;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Public reporting; Disparities; Systematic reviews;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Test accuracy; Diagnostic accuracy reviews; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; Meta-analytical methods; Diagnostic tests;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Adverse effects; Systematic reviews; Bibliographic databases; Information storage and retrieval; Harms; Literature review;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Risk of bias; Internal validity; Reliability; Systematic reviews; Meta-Analysis; Randomized controlled trials;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Missing participant data; Continuous outcomes; Risk of bias; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; Lost to follow-up;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Statins; Systematic reviews; Mixed treatment comparisons; Cardiovascular events;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Reporting bias; Publication bias; Food and Drug Administration; Unpublished evidence; Drug therapy;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Priority setting; Health equity; Osteoarthritis; Social determinants of health; Systematic reviews; Methods; Methodology; Research priorities;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Transcendental meditation; Blood pressure; Systematic reviews; Meta-analyses;
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Adolescent; Schools; Sexual health; Violence; Smoking; Alcohol; Drugs
Cochrane acute respiratory infections group's stakeholder engagement project identified systematic review priority areas
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Acute respiratory infections; Prioritization; Systematic reviews; Stakeholders; Cochrane;
High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Risk of bias; Systematic reviews; Diagnostic accuracy; Reproducibility; Study design;
Use of the PRECIS-II instrument to categorize reports along the efficacy-effectiveness spectrum in an hepatitis C virus care continuum systematic review and meta-analysis
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Efficacy; Effectiveness; Systematic reviews; Meta-analyses; Hepatitis C virus; Care continua; PRECIS-II;
Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Meta-analysis; Reporting; Systematic reviews; Methodology; Quality; Meta-research;
Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicability
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Guidelines; AMSTAR; ROBIS; Methodological quality; Risk of bias;
Systematic review of current guideline appraisals performed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument-a third of AGREE II users apply a cut-off for guideline quality
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Clinical; practice guidelines; Methodological guideline appraisal; Methodological quality; Systematic reviews; AGREE instrument; practice guidelines as topic;
A scoping review and survey provides the rationale, perceptions, and preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Randomized trials; Nonrandomized trials; GRADE; Clinical practice guidelines; Research methodology;
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Question formulation; Cochrane collaboration; Methods; Qualitative evidence synthesis; Protocol development;
Review articleCompliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Brain arteriovenous malformation; PRISMA guidelines; Literature review;
Equity issues were not fully addressed in Cochrane human immunodeficiency virus systematic reviews
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; HIV research; Equity; PROGRESS plus; Cochrane; Systematic reviews; Bibliometric analysis;
Latin American Clinical Epidemiology Network Series - Paper 3: Cochrane develops widely in Latin America and strengthens ties with LatinCLEN
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Cochrane; Latin America; LatinCLEN; Systematic reviews; Evidence-based medicine;
Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Acute coronary syndrome; ST-elevated myocardial infarction; Clinical practice guidelines; Systematic reviews; PRISMA; AMSTAR;
Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Climate change policy; IPCC; Science-policy advice; Scientometrics; Global environmental assessments; Systematic reviews;
GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; GRADE; Missing participant data; Risk of bias; Systematic reviews; Trials;
Original ReportTwin Peaks? No Evidence of Bimodal Distribution of Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Nonsurgical Interventions for Spinal Pain: An Exploratory Analysis
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Pain; clinical trials; systematic reviews; effectiveness;
The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; GRADE; Certainty of evidence; Thresholds; Guidelines; Systematic reviews; Health technology assessment;
Clinical trials and systematic reviews addressing similar interventions for the same condition do not consider similar outcomes to be important: a case study in HIV/AIDS
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Clinical trials; Systematic reviews; Outcomes; HIV/AIDS; Core outcome sets; Outcome selection;
Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Psoriasis; Systematic reviews; Risk of bias; Methodological quality; AMSTAR; ROBIS;
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 3: adapting frameworks to develop protocols
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Complex interventions; Evidence-based medicine; Review literature as topic; Systematic reviews; Research design; Analytic frameworks;
Tools to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews of nursing intervention in China: Global implications of the findings
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Chinese Journals; Risk of bias;
Original ArticleComplementary approaches to searching MEDLINE may be sufficient for updating systematic reviews
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Information retrieval; Systematic reviews; Support vector machine; Clinical query; PubMed similar articles; Searches; Updating; MEDLINE;
An Evidence-Based Approach to Conducting Systematic Reviews on CKD
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Systematic reviews; Research; Evidence-based medicine;
Recommendations for kidney disease guideline updating: a report by the KDIGO Methods Committee
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; clinical practice guideline; guideline development; guideline updating; nephrology; systematic reviews;
The skills and experience of GRADE methodologists can be assessed with a simple tool
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; GRADE; Clinical practice guidelines; Guidelines; Systematic reviews; Quality; Training;
Overview of the acupuncture parts in the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews and the Cochrane Collaboration
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; Cochrane Database; systematic reviews; acupuncture; evidence-based medicine;
Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached “high” GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions
Keywords: بررسی های سیستماتیک; GRADE; Complex interventions; Systematic reviews; Quality of evidence; Summary of findings tables; The Cochrane Collaboration;