کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1049828 | 945642 | 2010 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Coherence and fragmentation of landscape patterns as characterized by correlograms: A case study of Estonia Coherence and fragmentation of landscape patterns as characterized by correlograms: A case study of Estonia](/preview/png/1049828.png)
The homogenization and fragmentation of landscapes caused by intensive management is an increasing problem worldwide. Therefore, there is need for development of methods that help to improve sustainable management and maintain the identity of landscapes. We proposed that landscape coherence is the similarity between soil pattern (potential landscape) and land use intensity (actual landscape), which may be investigated by means of correlograms. We studied the spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) of raster format soil maps and land use maps (1:10,000; 10 m pixel size) in 35 study areas representing all landscape regions in Estonia. Various soil characteristics were taken into consideration in compiling the scale of contrast of 17 soil groups, whereas 19 land use types were ordered according to the intensity of human influence. We use a simple characteristic based on correlograms: a half-value distance lag, hI = 0.5, a distance where Moran's I equals 0.5. According to the value of hI = 0.5, in till-covered areas, the landscape structure is more fragmented in uplands than in lowlands. We found two study areas where the soil pattern was coherent with land use intensity, and detected a tendency that human influence makes the landscape pattern in uplands more homogeneous and in lowlands more heterogeneous, whereas the similarity between landscape patterns in lowlands and uplands is increasing due to human influence. This concept of coherence helps planners and decision makers to determine the optimal land use in landscapes by either reducing or increasing the fragmentation of the landscape pattern.
Journal: Landscape and Urban Planning - Volume 94, Issue 1, 15 January 2010, Pages 31–37