کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1165826 1491092 2012 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of three different enrichment strategies for serum low molecular weight protein identification using shotgun proteomics approach
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparison of three different enrichment strategies for serum low molecular weight protein identification using shotgun proteomics approach
چکیده انگلیسی

Serum low-molecular weight (LMW) proteins potentially contain useful biological information and their identification can be used to discover novel potential biomarkers. Given the high complexity of serum samples, in the last years several different prefractionation and enrichment strategies have been developed. In this study three different methods, i.e. hydrogel nanoparticles, Proteominer® peptide ligand affinity beads and Sartorius Vivaspin® centrifugal ultrafiltration device, were compared and evaluated in order to select the best strategy for the enrichment and prefractionation of LMW proteins. A shotgun proteomics approach was adopted, with in-solution proteolytic digestion of the whole protein mixture and determination of the resulting peptides by nanoHPLC coupled with a high-resolution Orbitrap LTQ-XL mass spectrometer. Data analysis, focusing on the LMW proteome (MW ≤ 40 kDa), has shown that the hydrogel nanoparticles performed better in enriching the LMW protein profiles, with 115 proteins identified against 93 and 95 for Proteominer® beads and Sartorius Vivaspin® device, respectively.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► Serum low molecular weight protein fractionation suitable for biomarker discovery.
► Comparison of three recent high-throughput methods for serum protein enrichment.
► Shotgun proteomics study of low molecular weight proteins isolated in serum.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Analytica Chimica Acta - Volume 740, 31 August 2012, Pages 58–65
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,