Method development for the determination of wood preservatives in commercially treated wood using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Fungicides and insecticides are commonly used preservatives to protect wood products against microbiological degradations. Currently, there is a lack of analytical methods addressing the quantitative determination of a wide range of wood preserving species in wood matrices. In this study, a reliable method was developed for the determination of a mixture of wood preserving agents with differing chemical structures (i.e., properties), including tebuconazole (TAZ), propiconazole (PAZ), 3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC), and permethrin (PER), in pine wood. The analyte recoveries obtained by Soxhlet and multiple-stage sonication extractions were compared. While both extraction methods yielded similar results (80–100%), Soxhlet extraction was found to be less labor-intensive and thus preferred providing also lower RSDs of 1–6%. In comparison to methanol, commonly used as an extraction solvent for triazoles, acetone yielded similar extraction efficiencies for all analytes while reducing the time of sample concentration. The solid phase extraction method for triazoles was adapted to allow for a separation of IPBC and PER from the wood matrix. As opposed to previous studies, three recovery standards were employed, which enabled the correction of individual analyte losses during the sample preparation. The matrix-affected limits of detection (LODs) using gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection were nearly the same for triazoles 0.07 and 0.21 ng g−1 for PAZ and TAZ in sapwood and 0.18 and 0.21 ng g−1 in heartwood, respectively. Higher LODs were observed for IPBC and PER: 3.9 and 1.7 ng g−1 in sapwood, and 2.0 and 6.0 ng g−1 in heartwood, respectively. The recoveries in the wood submitted to commercial sample treatment showed gradient distribution of analytes depending on the penetration of the treatment.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► The method developed for the analysis of species used for wood treatment was designed.
► The 80–100% recoveries were achieved for the species of differing chemical nature.
► The recovery standards enabled accurate quantification during the sample preparation.
► The method revealed gradient distribution of analytes in commercially treated wood.