کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1169205 | 1491165 | 2009 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Monitoring large numbers of slaughter animals for the presence of antimicrobial residues is preferably carried out using microbiological screening methods, because of their high cost-effectiveness. An evaluation of the Nouws antibiotic test (NAT) was performed on routine monitoring samples and the performance of the method was compared with two other microbial screening methods: Screening test for antibiotic residues (STAR) and Premi®Test. Analysis of 591 samples yielded four MRL violations. Three of them concerned tetracyclines that were only detected with the NAT and the STAR method. The fourth, 172 μg kg−1 Sulfadiazine, was detected by all three methods. Additionally, 156 μg kg−1 Tulathromycin was found in porcine meat, while for this residue no MRL in muscle has been established.
Journal: Analytica Chimica Acta - Volume 637, Issues 1–2, 1 April 2009, Pages 298–304