کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1184301 | 1492096 | 2016 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Compared deliquescence measurement methods and parameters.
• Recommended method parameters (aw, DVS, and DDI) for deliquescence.
• Contact points influence ternary blend RH0mix DVS and DDI measurements.
• Drop in aw upon dissolution of sugars that undergo mutarotation.
Many crystalline food ingredients undergo dissolution at a critical relative humidity known as the deliquescence point (RH0). Blends of crystalline ingredients exhibit deliquescence lowering, resulting in a deliquescence point (RH0mix) lower than the individual ingredient RH0s. To determine the effects of method type and data collection parameters, these deliquescence measurement methods were compared: saturated solution water activity, dynamic vapor sorption profiles (DVS), and dynamic dewpoint sorption profiles (DDI). Water activity measurements were broadly applicable for measuring deliquescence points when 1–4 g sample, 50–125 μL/g water:solid ratio, and 24–48 h equilibration were used. DVS and DDI techniques should be limited to samples containing 1–2 ingredients due to crystal contact point effects on RH0mix measurement. Recommended DVS parameters are: 1% RH step, 0.01% equilibrium criteria, and 3 h maximum time. DDI profiles were consistent with 50–150 mL/min vapor flow rates. Ingredient mutarotation, solute interactions in solution, and contact point limitations affect the determination of deliquescence points.
Journal: Food Chemistry - Volume 195, 15 March 2016, Pages 29–38