Can Cluster Structure Affect Kinetic Method Measurements? The Curious Case of Glutamic Acid's Gas-Phase Acidity

The gas-phase acidities of aspartic, glutamic, and 2-aminoadipic acid have been determined by the kinetic method in a triple-quadrupole instrument. Although aspartic acid behaves in the conventional way and gives a ΔHacid value of 1340 kJ mol−1, glutamic and 2-aminoadipic acids give kinetic method plots with two distinct slopes. This leads to ΔHacid values of 1350 and 1366 kJ mol−1 for glutamic acid, and 1355 and 1369 kJ mol−1 for 2-aminoadipic acid. The value for aspartic acid and the low collision energy value for glutamic acid are consistent with recent measurements by Poutsma and co-workers in a quadrupole ion trap. The experiments are supported by calculations at the G3(MP2) and OLYP/aug-cc-pVTZ levels. Computational studies of model clusters of the amino acids with trifluoroacetate suggest there are distinct preferences. Glutamic and 2-aminoadipic acid prefer clusters where the amino acid adopts a zwitterion-like structure whereas aspartic acid prefers to adopt a conventional (canonic) structure in its clusters. This result along with the computed stabilities of zwitterion-like conformations of the deprotonated amino acids leads to the following explanation for the presence of two slopes in the kinetic method plots. At low collision energies, the deprotonated amino acid dissociates from the cluster, with rearrangement if necessary, to give its preferred conformation, but at high collision energies, the deprotonated amino acid directly dissociates in the conformation preferred in the cluster. For glutamic and 2-aminoadipic acids, this is a zwitterion-like structure that is about 20 kJ mol-1 less stable than the global minimum.

Graphical AbstractThe graphic shows how, from a single complex, dissociation at different energies can lead to different product ion structures.Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (95 K)Download as PowerPoint slide