On axial temperature gradients due to large pressure drops in dense fluid chromatography

• Thermodynamics or Navier–Stokes can calculate temperature gradients from pressure drops.
• Axial thermal gradients are due to an adiabatic and isenthalpic Joule–Thomson expansion.
• In SFC, the mobile phase may warm or cool on expansion.
• The Navier–Stokes dissipation function, Φ, is widely misinterpreted by chromatographers.
• Any temperature change due to the dissipation function, Φ, is due to an increase in entropy.

The effect of energy degradation (Degradation is the creation of net entropy resulting from irreversibility.) accompanying pressure drops across chromatographic columns is examined with regard to explaining axial temperature gradients in both high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC). The observed effects of warming and cooling can be explained equally well in the language of thermodynamics or fluid dynamics. The necessary equivalence of these treatments is reviewed here to show the legitimacy of using whichever one supports the simpler determination of features of interest. The determination of temperature profiles in columns by direct application of the laws of thermodynamics is somewhat simpler than applying them indirectly by solving the Navier–Stokes (NS) equations. Both disciplines show that the preferred strategy for minimizing the reduction in peak quality caused by temperature gradients is to operate columns as nearly adiabatically as possible (i.e. as Joule–Thomson expansions). This useful fact, however, is not widely familiar or appreciated in the chromatography community due to some misunderstanding of the meaning of certain terms and expressions used in these disciplines. In fluid dynamics, the terms “resistive heating” or “frictional heating” have been widely used as synonyms for the dissipation function, Φ, in the NS energy equation. These terms have been widely used by chromatographers as well, but often misinterpreted as due to friction between the mobile phase and the column packing, when in fact Φ describes the increase in entropy of the system (dissipation, ∫TdSuniv > 0) due to the irreversible decompression of the mobile phase. Two distinctly different contributions to the irreversibility are identified; (1) ΔSext, viscous dissipation of work done by the external surroundings driving the flow (the pump) contributing to its warming, and (2) ΔSint, entropy change accompanying decompression of fluid in the column, contributing either to warming or cooling depending on local density and temperature. The molecular basis for this variation is described. Sample calculations of dissipation and temperature profiles of several model fluids including carbon dioxide-methanol mixtures are presented, based on the NIST REFPROP program including select equations of state and property calculation software.