کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1225572 | 1494802 | 2013 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Somatic embryogenesis can efficiently foster the propagation of Theobroma cacao, but the poor quality of resulted plantlet hinders the use of this technique in the commercial scale. The current study has been initiated to systematically compare the physiological mechanisms underlying somatic and zygotic embryogenesis in T. cacao on the proteome level. About 1000 protein spots per fraction could be separated by two-dimensional isoelectric focusing/SDS PAGE. More than 50 of the protein spots clearly differed in abundance between zygotic and somatic embryos: 33 proteins spots were at least 3-fold higher in abundance in zygotic embryos and 20 in somatic embryos. Analyses of these protein spots differing in volume by mass spectrometry resulted in the identification of 68 distinct proteins. Many of the identified proteins are involved in genetic information processing (21 proteins), carbohydrate metabolism (11 proteins) and stress response (7 proteins). Somatic embryos especially displayed many stress related proteins, few enzymes involved in storage compound synthesis and an exceptional high abundance of endopeptidase inhibitors. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, which was accumulated more than 3-fold higher in zygotic embryos, represents a prominent enzyme in the storage compound metabolism in cacao seeds. Implications on the improvement of somatic embryogenesis in cacao are discussed.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (130 K)Download as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► Proteomes of somatic and zygotic embryos of Theobroma cacao were compared.
► In depth physiological processes of embryogenesis in T. cacao are described.
► Carbohydrate metabolism greatly differs between somatic and zygotic embryos.
► Stress induced proteins were the major distinguish feature of somatic embryogenesis.
► Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase is a key enzyme of storage compounds metabolism.
Journal: Journal of Proteomics - Volume 78, 14 January 2013, Pages 123–133