کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1225839 | 968254 | 2012 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Mass spectrometry-based global proteomics experiments generate large sets of data that can be converted into useful information only with an appropriate statistical approach. We present Diffprot — a software tool for statistical analysis of MS-derived quantitative data. With implemented resampling-based statistical test and local variance estimate, Diffprot allows to draw significant results from small scale experiments and effectively eliminates false positive results. To demonstrate the advantages of this software, we performed two spike-in tests with complex biological matrices, one label-free and one based on iTRAQ quantification; in addition, we performed an iTRAQ experiment on bacterial samples. In the spike-in tests, protein ratios were estimated and were in good agreement with theoretical values; statistical significance was assigned to spiked proteins and single or no false positive results were obtained with Diffprot. We compared the performance of Diffprot with other statistical tests — widely used t-test and non-parametric Wilcoxon test. In contrast to Diffprot, both generated many false positive hits in the spike-in experiment. This proved the superiority of the resampling-based method in terms of specificity, making Diffprot a rational choice for small scale high-throughput experiments, when the need to control the false positive rate is particularly pressing.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (46 K)Download as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► We describe Diffprot — new software for differential proteomics.
► Diffprot allows to obtain significant results with low number of replicates.
► High selectivity of Diffprot assures a low number of false positive results.
► Performance is demonstrated with spike-in tests and real-life experiment.
► Statistical test implemented in Diffprot is compared with t-test and Wilcoxon test.
Journal: Journal of Proteomics - Volume 75, Issue 13, 16 July 2012, Pages 4062–4073