کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1239621 1495696 2015 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Reduction of determinate errors in mass bias-corrected isotope ratios measured using a multi-collector plasma mass spectrometer
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
کاهش خطاهای تعیین شده در نسبت های ایزوتوپ تصحیح متعصب جرمی اندازه گیری شده با استفاده از یک طیف سنج جرم پلاسما چند جمع
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
چکیده انگلیسی

A nebulizer-centric instrument response function model of the plasma mass spectrometer was combined with a signal drift model, and the result was used to identify the causes of the non-spectroscopic determinate errors remaining in mass bias-corrected Pb isotope ratios (Tl as internal standard) measured using a multi-collector plasma mass spectrometer. Model calculations, confirmed by measurement, show that the detectable time-dependent errors are a result of the combined effect of signal drift and differences in the coordinates of the Pb and Tl response function maxima (horizontal offset effect). If there are no horizontal offsets, then the mass bias-corrected isotope ratios are approximately constant in time.In the absence of signal drift, the response surface curvature and horizontal offset effects are responsible for proportional errors in the mass bias-corrected isotope ratios. The proportional errors will be different for different analyte isotope ratios and different at every instrument operating point. Consequently, mass bias coefficients calculated using different isotope ratios are not necessarily equal.The error analysis based on the combined model provides strong justification for recommending a three step correction procedure (mass bias correction, drift correction and a proportional error correction, in that order) for isotope ratio measurements using a multi-collector plasma mass spectrometer.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy - Volume 107, 1 May 2015, Pages 56–60
نویسندگان
,