Modeling gas flow in PEMFC channels: Part I – Flow pattern transitions and pressure drop in a simulated ex situ channel with uniform water injection through the GDL

The two-phase flow in the gas channels of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is studied with an ex situ setup using a gas diffusion layer (GDL) as the sidewall of the channels. Air is supplied at the channel inlet manifold and water is supplied continuously and uniformly through the GDL along the length of the channel. This is different from the simultaneous air and water introduction at the inlet of the channel as studied by previous two-phase flow researchers. The GDL is compressed between the gas channels and the water chambers to simulate PEMFC conditions. The superficial velocity for air and water ranged from 0.25 to 34.5 m/s and 1.54 × 10−5 to 1.54 × 10−4 m/s, respectively. The ex situ setup was run in both vertical and horizontal orientations with two GDLs, – Baseline (Mitsubishi Rayon Co. MRC 105 with 5 wt.% PTFE and coated with an in-house MPL by General Motors) and SGL 25 BC – and three channel treatments – hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and untreated Lexan, with contact angles of 116°, 11° and 86°, respectively. No appreciable effect was noted because of the orientation, GDL type or channel coatings. The flow regime is observed at different locations along the channel and is expressed as a function of the superficial air and water velocities. Flow regime criteria are developed and validated against the range of ex situ data observations. A new variable water flow rate pressure drop model is developed in order to account for the variation of water entering the channel at multiple locations along the flow length. Pressure drop models are developed for specific flow regimes and validated against experimental data. The models are able to predict the experimental pressure drop data with a mean error of less than 14%.

► Ex situ experiments in simulated PEMFC gas channels with variable water flow rate along the flow length.
► Modified constant water flow rate pressure drop models to account for microscale effects.
► Variable water flow rate pressure drop model development and testing.
► Good agreement between the experimental data and new variable water flow rate pressure drop model within 4–14%.