کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1331222 | 1500116 | 2013 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Significant effects of p–d hybridization, structural distortion and cation-electro-negativity are found on band gap in ZnSnX2 (X=P, As, Sb). Our study suggests these compounds to be direct band gap semiconductors with band gaps of 1.23, 0.68 and 0.19 eV respectively. Lattice constants, tetragonal distortion (η)(η), anion displacement, bond lengths and bulk moduli are calculated by Density Functional Theory based on Tight binding Linear Muffin-Tin orbital method. Our result of structural properties is in good agreement with the available experimental and other theoretical results. Calculated band gaps also agree well with the experimental works within LDA limitation. Unlike other semiconductors in the group II–IV–V2, there is a reduction in the band gap of 0.22, 0.20 and 0.24 eV respectively in ZnSnX2 (X=P, As, Sb) due to p–d hybridization. Structural distortion decreases band gap by 0.20, 0.12 and 0.10 eV respectively. We find that cation electronegativity effect is responsible for increasing the band gap relative to their binary analogs GaInP2GaInP2, InGaAs2InGaAs2 and GaInSb2GaInSb2 respectively and increment are 0.13, 0.04 and 0.13 eV respectively.
One unit cell of ZnSnX2 (X=P, As, Sb) chalcopyrite semiconductor. Semiconductors ZnSnX2 (X=P, As, Sb) are found to be direct band gap semiconductors with band gaps 1.23, 0.68 and 0.19 eV respectively. The quantitative estimate of effects of p–d hybridization, structural distortion and cation electronegativity shows band gaps change significantly due to these effects.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► ZnSnX2 (X=P, As, Sb) are direct band gap semiconductors.
► These have band gaps of 1.23 eV, 0.68 eV and 0.19 eV respectively.
► The band gap reduction due to p–d hybridization is 13.41%, 18.51% and 40% respectively.
► Band gap reduction due to structural distortion is 12.12%, 11.11% and 16.66% respectively.
► Band gap increases 8.38%, 3.70% and 21.31% respectively due to cation electronegativity.
Journal: Journal of Solid State Chemistry - Volume 200, April 2013, Pages 279–286