کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1407749 | 1501895 | 2007 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

In our efforts to investigate the influences of different pendant aromatic groups and the spatial position of N donors in 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole-based ligands on the structures of their metal complexes, five structurally related ligands: 1-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]benzene (L1), 1-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]naphthalene (L2), 8-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]quinoline (L3), 3-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]pyridine (L4) and 4-[3-(2- pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]pyridine (L5), have been used to react with AgClO4 to form five Ag(I) complexes, [Ag(L1)2](ClO4) (1), [Ag(L2)2](ClO4) (2), [Ag(L3)(HL3)](ClO4)2(CH3CN) (3), {[Ag(L4)](ClO4)}2 (4), and {[Ag(L5)](ClO4)}∞ (5). The structural differences of these complexes may be attributed to the coordination geometries or N donor position of the pendant aromatic groups in ligands L1–L5. Also, the result reveals that various intra- and/or inter-molecular weak interactions, such as π⋯π stacking, C–H⋯π and C–H⋯O H-bonding interactions, play important roles in the formation of 1–5, especially in the aspect of linking the multi-nuclear discrete subunits or low-dimensional entities into high-dimensional frameworks. Moreover, the coordination behaviors of ligands L1–L5 have been briefly evaluated by DFT calculations.
Journal: Journal of Molecular Structure - Volume 843, Issues 1–3, 29 October 2007, Pages 66–77